FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-10074 14-10075 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:12-cr-00355-RCC v. 4:13-cr-01178-RCC

LUIS ENSALDO-FLORES, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015**

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Luis Ensaldo-Flores appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive four-

month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Ensaldo-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Ensaldo-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on these direct appeals.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10074 & 14-10075