NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 05 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10012

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:13-cr-01021-GMS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM* MOISES HUIZAR-FLORES, a.k.a. Moises Flores Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar, a.k.a. Moses Huizar, a.k.a. Ranato Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar-Martinez,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 30, 2014** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

Moises Huizar-Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Huizar-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Huizar-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Huizar-Flores has waived his right to appeal his reentry of a removed alien conviction and 46-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2