MEMORANDUM **

In this case, brought under the ADA, the district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. It .concluded that although “there would be a material issue of fact with respect to the slope of the areas challenged by Plaintiff because [Plaintiffs and Defendants’ witnesses, both of whom made measurements after remediation had purportedly occurred,] reach contrary conclusions,” Kohler’s witness had not demonstrated his qualifications to serve as an expert witness; therefore, it refused to consider his declaration.

Subsequently, we held in Strong v. Valdez Fine Foods, 724 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2013), that a disabled plaintiff complaining of precisely the same barrier — excessive slopes in a parking lot — was not required to offer expert evidence or precise measurements to survive summary judgment. We therefore vacate the portion of the district court’s judgment challenged on appeal and remand this case for reconsideration in light of Strong. 1

VACATED and REMANDED.

Costs awarded to Kohler.