United States v. Nabor Campillo-Vega
United States v. Nabor Campillo-Vega
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 24 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10641
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00478-JGZ
v. MEMORANDUM* NABOR CAMPILLO-VEGA, a.k.a. Eduardo Campillo-Vega, a.k.a. Juan Manuel Vega-Zuniga,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 17, 2015**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Nabor Campillo-Vega appeals from the revocation of supervised release and
24-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Campillo-Vega’s counsel has filed a brief stating
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Campillo-Vega the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 13-10641
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished