MEMORANDUM **

Luis Enrique Avila-Aeosta appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Avila-Acosta contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to respond to his non-frivolous argument for leniency and by failing to explain adequately its sentence. We review for harmless error, see United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 631 F.3d 1028, 1030 & n. 5 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam), and find no error. The record reflects that the district court considered Avila-Acosta’s arguments' for leniency, and the court’s explanation of its low-end Guidelines sentence was adequate. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.