United States v. Tarl Brandon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Tarl Brandon

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10281

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00494-KJD-

VCF-1 v. District of Nevada,

Las Vegas TARL BRANDON,

Defendant - Appellant. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10282

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00209-KJD-

VCF-1 v. District of Nevada,

Las Vegas TARL BRANDON,

Defendant - Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10283

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00407-KJD-

GWF-1 v. District of Nevada,

Las Vegas TARL BRANDON,

Defendant - Appellant. Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on December 11, 2014 is amended as follows:

At page 2, line 23, the following citation is added:

“Eslaminia v. White, 136 F.3d 1234, 1237 & n.1 (9th Cir. 1998)”

With this amendment, the panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Ikuta votes to deny petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Noonan and Judge Fernandez recommend denying the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished