FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 19 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-10083 14-10084 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01315-RCC v. 4:10-cr-02852-RCC JULIO OMAR ROCHA-MIRANDA, a.k.a. Julio O. Rocha Miranda, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Kimberly A. Moore, Circuit Judge, Presiding** Submitted May 13, 2015*** Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Julio Omar Rocha-Miranda appeals his guilty- plea conviction and 21-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Kimberly A. Moore, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and 9-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rocha-Miranda’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rocha-Miranda the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10083 & 14-10084