FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EXCEPTIONAL CHILD CENTER, INC.; No. 12-35382 INCLUSION, INC.; TOMORROW’S HOPE SATELLITE SERVICES, INC.; D.C. No. WDB, INC.; LIVING INDEPENDENTLY 1:09-cv-00634- FOR EVERYONE, INC., BLW Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ORDER AND AMENDED RICHARD ARMSTRONG; LESLIE ORDER CLEMENT, Defendants-Appellants.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Filed May 14, 2015 Amended June 5, 2015 Before: Richard C. Tallman and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Stephen Joseph Murphy,* District Judge.

* The Honorable Stephen Joseph Murphy III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

2 EXCEPTIONAL CHILD CTR. V. ARMSTRONG ORDER The Idaho Attorney General’s Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED. The order filed on May 14, 2015, is withdrawn and replaced with the accompanying amended order. The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is therefore DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

AMENDED ORDER The original decision entered by this court, reported at 567 F. App’x 496, was reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held that the Supremacy Clause does not provide an implied private right of action and that Medicaid providers do not otherwise have the ability to proceed in equity for enforcement of § 30(A) of the Medicaid Act. See Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1378 (2015). Accordingly, the Supreme Court has now specifically addressed the question our court had previously addressed, and the opinion upon which we relied, Indep.

Living Ctr. of S. Cal. v. Shewry, 543 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2008), is no longer valid and is overruled. See Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, we vacate the district court’s injunction, and remand with direction to the district court to dismiss the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

REVERSED and REMANDED.