U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Jusaino-Gomez

United States v. Jusaino-Gomez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 28, 2015 · Canby, Bea, Murguia
611 F. App'x 421

United States v. Jusaino-Gomez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Gonzalo Jusaino-Gomez appeals his jury-trial conviction and 92-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and 12-month consecutive sentence *422 imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jusaino-Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Jusaino-Gomez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. We, therefore, affirm Jusaino-Gomez’s conviction and sentence in Appeal No. 13-10332, and the revocation of supervised release and sentence in Appeal No. 13-10331.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.