U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Juan Elisea-Gonzalez

United States v. Juan Elisea-Gonzalez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 19, 2015

United States v. Juan Elisea-Gonzalez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 19 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10459 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01998-CKJ v. MEMORANDUM* JUAN ELISEA-GONZALEZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 14, 2015** Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Juan Elisea-Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 68-month sentence imposed on remand for resentencing. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Elisea-Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as counsel of record. We have provided Elisea-Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-10459

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.