Serozh Nazari v. Loretta E. Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Serozh Nazari v. Loretta E. Lynch, 623 F. App'x 313 (9th Cir. 2015)

Serozh Nazari v. Loretta E. Lynch

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Serozh Nazari, a native and citizen of Iran, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”): .its dismissal of his appeal of a removal order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Reviewing for substantial evidence the BIA’s dismissal of Petitioner’s appeal, Ahmed v. Keisler, 504 F.3d 1183, 1191 (9th Cir. 2007), we deny the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Petitioner firmly resettled in Germany, where he was granted asylum and received an unlimited residency permit.

2. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that the harm Petitioner suffered in Germany did not rise to the level of past persecution and that Petitioner did not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution or a likelihood of torture.

Petition DENIED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Serozh NAZARI, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished