U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2015

United States v. David Miranda-Ramirez

United States v. David Miranda-Ramirez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 30, 2015

United States v. David Miranda-Ramirez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 30 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50075 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:14-cr-02307-WQH-1 v. MEMORANDUM* DAVID MIRANDA-RAMIREZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 24, 2015** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

David Miranda-Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his sentence of 37 months in prison and one year supervised release for attempted re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Miranda-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Miranda-Ramirez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.