MEMORANDUM **

Rudolph Decambra, amative and citizen of Guyana, petitions for review of the *560 Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Arbid v. Holder, 700 F.3d 379, 385-86 (9th Cir. 2012). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Decambra’s CAT claim because Decambra failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guyana. See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013). We reject Decam-bra’s contention that the BIA did not consider Decambra’s news article or all of the country report.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.