MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiff Christina M. Chappell appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of disability benefits. We affirm.

*629 The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) did not err at steps four and five, as she gave specific, legitimate reasons based on substantial evidence for giving greater weight to non-examining sources than to treating and examining sources; specific, clear, and convincing reasons for finding Chappell’s testimony not credible; and germane reasons for rejecting Chappell’s mother’s lay testimony. See Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1111-14 (9th Cir. 2012).

Although the ALJ erred at step three by relying on Dr. Moore’s testimony to find that Chappell did not meet Listing 12.04’s paragraph C criteria when Dr. Moore did not specifically testify about the paragraph C criteria, the error was harmless in light of the other evidence in the record. See id. at 1115.

AFFIRMED.