Thomas v. County of Riverside

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Thomas v. County of Riverside, 776 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2015)
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5520; 2015 WL 108417

Thomas v. County of Riverside

Opinion of the Court

*1021ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 18, 2014, and published at 763 F.3d 1167, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 9 of the slip opinion, replace “moot.1” with “moot as to the County of Riverside, Grotefend, Schertell, Hall, and Woods.1 With regards to Gemende and McArthur, we remand for the district court to determine whether they are entitled to attorneys’ fees in light of the lack of evidence that they had any supervisory authority over Thomas.”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Kozinski and Clifton vote to deny the- petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Rakoff so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. See Fed. R.App. P. 36(f).

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

Reference

Full Case Name
Wendy THOMAS Service Employees International Union, Local 721 Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Larry Grotefend, individually Dennis Erick Schertell, individually Rick Hall, individually Brian McArthur, individually Heather Woods, individually Margie Gemende, individually Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published