U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2015

Carlwig v. Carlwig

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 17, 2015 · Fernandez, Nguyen, Pregerson

783 F.3d 763 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Matthew' A.' Fitzgerald (argued), Christopher Trible, and Lauren Woods, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA; Leslie M. Werlin, Dana Palmer, Molly White, Blake Olson, and True Nguyen, McGuire-Woods LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Philip D. Parrish (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, FA; Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, FA, for Defendant-Appellee., Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. Lemon, and Jennafer Dorfman Wagner, Berkeley, CA; Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Amici Curiae Family Violence Appellate Project, California Women’s Law Center, Legal Momentum, Women’s Law Project, and Professor Jane Stoever.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sacchi v. Dervishi (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Sarah Carlwig appeals the decision and order of the district court sending A.L.C. and E.R.S.C., dual-national American and Swedish children, to Sweden pursuant to the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the “Convention”), and its implementing legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 22 U.S.C.A. §§ 9001-11. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We hereby vacate the portion of the district court’s order, Carlwig v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 16 F.Supp.3d 1075 (C.D.Cal. 2014), concerning the habitual residence of E.R.S.C.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.