U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Campillo-Vega

United States v. Campillo-Vega
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 24, 2015 · Fernandez, Leavy, Scannlain
594 F. App'x 350

United States v. Campillo-Vega

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Nabor Campillo-Vega appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 24-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Campillo-Vega’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Campillo-Vega the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.