United States v. Aaron Thomas
United States v. Aaron Thomas
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 25 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10335
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-cr-01364-DCB v. MEMORANDUM* AARON MATTHEW THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 20, 2016** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Aaron Matthew Thomas appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Thomas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Thomas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 15-10335
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished