U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Aaron Thomas

United States v. Aaron Thomas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 25, 2016

United States v. Aaron Thomas

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 25 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10335 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-cr-01364-DCB v. MEMORANDUM* AARON MATTHEW THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 20, 2016** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Matthew Thomas appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Thomas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Thomas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 15-10335

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.