Salvador Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Salvador Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. Lynch, 633 F. App'x 392 (9th Cir. 2016)

Salvador Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. Lynch

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Salvador Perez-Guzman, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez-Guzman’s motion to reopen as untimely where it was filed more than two years after the final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to show a change in country conditions in Mexico sufficiently material to him in order to warrant reopening, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii), Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) (setting forth the requirements for prevailing on a motion to reopen due to changed country conditions).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Salvador PEREZ-GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished