MEMORANDUM **

Michael H. Vartanian appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing him as a plaintiff. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1997), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Vartanian as a plaintiff because, as a non-attorney, Vartanian cannot represent York Hing Law in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654 (“In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel.... ”); C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (“Although a non-attorney may appear in propria persona in his own behalf, that privilege is personal to him. [The non-attorney] ... has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.” (internal citation omitted)).

Since Vartanian cannot represent Law in this action, and Law did not sign the *419 notice of appeal, we do not consider any arguments regarding the district court’s dismissal of Law’s claims.

We do not consider Vartanian’s arguments regarding his next-of-friend status or associational standing because they were raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

Vartanian’s requests, set forth in his opening brief, are denied.

AFFIRMED.