U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Clarence Tsosie

United States v. Clarence Tsosie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2016 · Hug, Farris, Leavy
633 F. App'x 411

United States v. Clarence Tsosie

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Clarence Tsosie appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his. *412 guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for assault resulting in serious injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(a)(6). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Tsosie’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Tsosie the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Tsosie has waived his right to appeal his conviction, sentence, and order of restitution. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3..

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.