U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2016 · Thomas

815 F.3d 1178; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3490; 2016 WL 762018 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Jared Morgan Galanis, Gross Law P.C., Todd Richard Gregorian, Fenwick & West LLP, San Francisco, CA, Stuart George Gross, Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, Burlingame, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Gary S. Alexander, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Margaret Elaine Mecken-stock, Office of the Attorney General, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham (9th Cir. 2016)
Kevin Marilley v. Charlton Bonham (9th Cir. 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-02418-DMR.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.