MEMORANDUM **

Noel Gallardo-Medina appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*491 Gallardo-Medina contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the unduly harsh nature of the methamphetamine Guidelines and the district court’s failure to give sufficient weight to the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Gallardo-Medina’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and. the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the offense and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586; United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district court.”).

AFFIRMED.