FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 18 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLARISSA URIAS INZUNZA, AKA No. 13-72341 Clariza Urias-Inzunza, Agency No. A205-147-211 Petitioner,

v. ORDER*

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 12, 2016** San Francisco, California

Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Urias Inzunza petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

decision that she was not entitled to a favorable exercise of discretion in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). connection with her application for cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) precludes judicial review of such a determination.

PETITION DISMISSED.

-2-