U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Matthew Devins

United States v. Matthew Devins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2016

United States v. Matthew Devins

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 18 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30253 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-06051-SMJ v. MEMORANDUM* MATTHEW JOHN DEVINS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 13, 2016** Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Matthew John Devins appeals from the revocation of supervised release and six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Devins’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provided Devins the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 15-30253

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.