U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Javier Figueroa-Constantino

United States v. Javier Figueroa-Constantino
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2016 · Farris, Tallman, Bybee
648 F. App'x 700

United States v. Javier Figueroa-Constantino

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Figueroa-Constantino appeals from the revocation of supervised release and six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Figueroa-Constantino’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Figueroa-Constantino the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.