Peter Deacon v. Pandora Media

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Peter Deacon v. Pandora Media

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 21 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PETER DEACON, individually and on No. 12-17734 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04674-SBA Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ORDER*

PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015 San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation. On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme

Court, which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.

In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves this case, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished