Jesus Gutierrez-Neyoy v. Loretta E. Lynch
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jesus Manuel Gutierrez-Neyoy, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermit-ting his applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Leal v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1140, 1144 (9th Cir. 2014), and deny the petition for review.
Gutierrez-Neyoy’s contention that his conviction for felony endangerment under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1201(A) is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude is foreclosed by our decision in Leal v. Holder. Id. at 1146 (felony endangerment in Arizona is a crime involving moral turpitude). Accordingly, the BIA did not err in determining that Gutierrez-Neyoy is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(3), 1229b(b)(1)(B), 1229c(b)(1)(B).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jesus Manuel GUTIERREZ-NEYOY, AKA Jesus Manuel Guitierrez-Neyoy, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
- Status
- Unpublished