U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

United States v. Craig Frazier

United States v. Craig Frazier
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 16, 2016 · Hug, Farris, Canby
668 F. App'x 262

United States v. Craig Frazier

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Frazier appeals from the district court’s order denying his “Rule 60(b) and 3582 Motion to Reduce Sentence.” Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Frazier’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Frazier the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

*263 Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R, 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.