United States v. Ljo, Juvenile Male

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Ljo, Juvenile Male, 668 F. App'x 279 (9th Cir. 2016)
Hawkins, Graber, Selna

United States v. Ljo, Juvenile Male

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The United States appeals the district court’s judgment of acquittal. The district court held that it lacked jurisdiction over this juvenile delinquency case under the Indian Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153, because the government had presented insufficient evidence at trial to establish that LJO’s Indian blood derived from a federally recognized tribe, citing United States v. Zepeda, 705 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2013). Intervening authority requires that we reverse and remand for the *280 district co.urt to consider the effect of the superseding en banc opinion in United States v. Zepeda, 792 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1712, 194 L.Ed.2d 810 (2016). The district court should also decide in the first instance whether to take judicial notice of the Tohono O’odham Constitution for purposes of determining whether the government proved beyond a reasonable doubt that LJO has “some quantum of Indian blood.” Id. at 1113.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LJO, Juvenile Male, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished