U. S. Securities & Exchange v. Francis Wilde
U. S. Securities & Exchange v. Francis Wilde
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 03 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND No. 13-55043 EXCHANGE COMMISSION, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 8:11-cv-00315-DOC-AJW
v. MEMORANDUM* FRANCIS WILDE; et al.,
Defendants,
and
MARK A. GELAZELA,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND No. 13-55295 EXCHANGE COMMISSION, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 8:11-cv-00315-DOC-AJW
v.
FRANCIS WILDE; et al.,
Defendants-Appellants,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. and
STEVEN E. WOODS; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 26, 2016**
Before: D.W. NELSON, GRABER, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Defendants appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment on
the Securities and Exchange Commission’s securities fraud claims. We affirm the
district court’s order because defendants have failed to demonstrate a genuine
dispute as to any material fact in this case. We also find that the district court acted
within its discretion by ordering disgorgement of the ill-gotten gains.
AFFIRMED.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished