Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit October 6, 2016

Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus, 669 F. App'x 471 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment follow *472 ing a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We cannot review any of Telles’ contentions challenging his jury trial because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Henry William TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished