U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2016

Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus

Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2016 · Tashima, Silverman, Smith
669 F. App'x 471

Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment follow *472 ing a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We cannot review any of Telles’ contentions challenging his jury trial because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.