United States v. Nicholas Matheson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Nicholas Matheson

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 24 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30300

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:01-cr-00062-WFN-1 v.

NICHOLAS PATRICK MATHESON, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 3, 2016** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Nicholas Matheson appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion to vacate for lack of jurisdiction his 2001 conviction for simple assault in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5). Because Matheson sought to challenge his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). conviction more than a dozen years after it had become final, the district court

below did not have jurisdiction to entertain his motion. See Travelers Indem. Co.

v. Bailey, 557 U.S. 137, 154 (2009); Chicot Cty. Drainage Dist. v. Baxter State

Bank, 308 U.S. 371, 376 (1940); Stoll v. Gottlieb, 305 U.S. 165, 172 (1938).

Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for dismissal for lack

of jurisdiction.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished