MEMORANDUM *

Shousong Chi, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We review the agency’s factual findings for substantial evidence. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Chi did not establish *449 that his past harm rose to the level of persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1020-21 (9th Cir. 2006). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s conclusion that Chi did not establish an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution. Id. at 1022. Thus, Chi’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.