United States v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Moore, 656 F. App'x 377 (9th Cir. 2016)
Clifton, Leavy, Scannlain

United States v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Kejuan Chaviz Moore appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 11-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Moore the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
United States v. Kejuan Chaviz MOORE
Status
Published