United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wilde
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Defendants appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s securities fraud claims. We affirm the district court’s order because defendants have failed to demonstrate a genuine dispute as to any material fact in this case. We also find that the district court acted within its discretion by ordering disgorgement of the ill-gotten gains.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Francis WILDE, and Mark A. Gelazela, Defendant-Appellant United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Francis Wilde, and Steven E. Woods
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published