U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Oscar Rosales-Aguilar

United States v. Oscar Rosales-Aguilar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2017 · Trott, Tashima, Callahan
674 F. App'x 734

United States v. Oscar Rosales-Aguilar

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Rosales-Aguilar appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 38-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rosales-Aguilar’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rosales-Aguilar the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Rosales-Aguilar waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.