United States v. Marcos De Jesus-Zeferino
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Marcos De Jesus-Zeferino appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the nine-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
De Jesus-Zeferino claims that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his arguments for a low-end sentence. We disagree. The record reflects that the court considered De Jesus-Zeferi-no’s arguments and sufficiently explained its reasons for concluding that a mid-range sentence was warranted. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
De Jesus-Zeferino’s unopposed motion to take judicial notice of the presentence report is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcos De JESUS-ZEFERINO, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished