Elizabeth North v. Bank of America, N.A.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 27, 2017

Elizabeth North v. Bank of America, N.A., 678 F. App'x 575 (9th Cir. 2017)

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Elizabeth Hope North appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismiss *576 ing her diversity action alleging state law claims related to foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a denial of leave to amend a complaint. Zu cco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp., 552 F.3d 981, 989 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing North’s action without granting further leave to" amend because further amendment would be futile. See id: at 1007 (explaining that a district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad where plaintiff has faded to cure deficiencies by previous amendments).

Appellees’ request for judicial notice, filed on December 4, 2014, is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Elizabeth Hope NORTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished