U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Fredy Hernandez-Maldonado

United States v. Fredy Hernandez-Maldonado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2017 · Gould, Clifton, Hurwitz
687 F. App'x 581

United States v. Fredy Hernandez-Maldonado

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fredy Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado appeals from the district court’s judgment *582 and challenges the 25-month sentence imposed on remand following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Maldonado’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Hernandez-Maldonado the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *582 ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.