MEMORANDUM **

Perfecto Acevedo Sanchez appeals from the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sanchez contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying him a further sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court did not abuse its discretion by reducing Sanchez’s sentence from 210 to 189 months. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(B); United States v. Dunn, 728 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2013). Moreover, contrary to Sanchez’s contention, the record reflects that the district court considered his arguments for a greater sentence reduction and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See United States v. Trujillo, 713 F.3d 1003, 1009 (9th Cir. 2013).

AFFIRMED.