MEMORANDUM **

1. The only evidence in the record that Torres’s 1993 kidnapping and beating was “inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official” is Torres’s statement that Delmar Mugel, his main assailant, said he was a police officer. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1). The record thus does not “compel[ ] a contrary *456 conclusion” to the BIA’s determination that Torres failed to establish that Mugel was a public official. Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940, 944 (9th Cir. 2007).

Nor does the record compel a contrary-conclusion to the BIA’s determination that Torres’s fear of future harm was too speculative. Cf . Haile v. Holder, 658 F.3d 1122, 1132-33 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of future harm not speculative where petitioner presented evidence of recent persecution of her father and danger faced by political dissidents).

2. Torres waived his challenge to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen and his motion for reconsideration by failing to raise these issues in his briefing. Martinez-Serrano v. I.N.S., 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).

DENIED AND DISMISSED.