U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2017

N v. David Goodrich

N v. David Goodrich
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 5, 2017 · Paez, Bea, Murguia
693 F. App'x 601

N v. David Goodrich

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying her post-judgment motions “for rulings on leave to file as a vexatious litigant and return of bonds,” to disqualify the chapter 7 trustee, and for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C, §§ 158(d) and 1291. We affirm.

In the opening brief, Hunt fails to address how the district court erred in denying her motion's. As a result, Hunt has waived her challenge to the district court’s orders. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review only issues which are argued' specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.”).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.