John Karczewski v. K Motors, Inc.
John Karczewski v. K Motors, Inc.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 10 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN KARCZEWSKI, No. 15-55588 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-02701-MMA-WVG v. K MOTORS, INC., MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 6, 2017** Pasadena, California Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED Karczewski v. K Motors Inc., No. 15-55588 JUL 10 2017 BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante: MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.