MEMORANDUM **

Mahmood Yoonessi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for *523 failure to prosecute his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Yoonesf s action with prejudice after weighing the pertinent factors and evaluating alternatives to dismissal. See id. at 1260-63 (setting forth factors for determining whether a pro se action should be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Defendant Prudential Mortgage Capital Company, Now Known As PGIM Real Estate Finance, LLC.’s pending motion (Docket Entry No. 7) is granted.

Defendants Citibank TIAA and David Howerton’s pending motion (Docket Entry No. 17) is granted.

Yoonesi’s motion for leave to file a late reply brief (Docket Entry No. 39) is granted. The Clerk shall file the reply brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 41.

Yoonesi’s remaining pending motions (Docket Entry Nos. 6, 40, and 42) are denied.

AFFIRMED.