Fausto Renato Quevedo v. Jefferson Sessions

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Fausto Renato Quevedo v. Jefferson Sessions, 702 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2017)
Kozinski, Hawkins, Parker

Fausto Renato Quevedo v. Jefferson Sessions

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

To qualify for Convention Against Torture relief a petitioner must show that “it is more likely than not that he ... would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal,” 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2). The IJ didn’t err by finding that Quevedo failed to meet this standard. Substantial evidence supported the IJ’s determination that the beating Quevedo suffered wasn’t torture. See Ahmed v. Keisler, 504 F.3d 1183, 1201 (9th Cir. 2007). His later peaceful interaction with Guatemalan police further demonstrates that he’s unlikely to be tortured if returned to Guatemala.

DENIED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Fausto Renato QUEVEDO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished