MEMORANDUM *

1. The district court increased Navar-rete-Zavala’s sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(12) for maintaining a stash house. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(12), cmt. n.17 (2015). Under the circumstances of this case, the district court did not err by imposing this enhancement.

2. Even if the district court mistakenly applied the enhancement from § 2S1.1(b)(2)(B) as a specific offense characteristic while calculating Navarrete-Zavala’s sentence under the drug distribution guideline § 2D1.1, any error was harmless. See United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 631 F.3d 1028, 1030-31 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. Ali, 620 F.3d 1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2010). Had the district court calculated Navarrete-Zavala’s Guidelines range in the manner she urges, it would have resulted in the same offense level used to calculate the Guidelines range. See U.S.S.G. § 3D1.3(b).

3. On the facts of this case, the district court abused its discretion by denying Na-varrete-Zavala’s request to seal the transcripts from her sentencing hearings and the parties’ joint request to seal the government’s sentencing memorandum. See United States v. Doe, 870 F.3d 991, 994 (9th Cir. 2017).

Navarrete-Zavala’s sentence is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED for the district court to seal the government’s sentencing memorandum and the transcripts from Navarrete-Zavala’s sentencing hearings.