United States v. Niem Doan
United States v. Niem Doan
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 14 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-30311
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00120-JCC-4 v.
NIEM H. DOAN, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 8, 2017** Seattle, Washington
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Niam Doan appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 150-month sentence imposed
for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
counsel for Doan has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished