U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2017

United States v. DJO Global, Inc.

United States v. DJO Global, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2017 · Amon, Nguyen, Thomas
678 F. App'x 594

Counsel

Phillip Eugene Benson, Esquire, Attorney, Warren-Benson Law Group, Minne-tonka, MN, Linda R. MacLean, Linda R. MacLean, Newport Beach, CA, Gerald C. Robinson, Simmer Law Group, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Donald R. Warren, Esquire, Attorney, Warren-Benson Law Group, LA Jolla, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Raymond A. Cardozo, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA, Francisca Minghao Mok, Esquire, Attorney, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Thomas Howie Suddath, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellee DJO LLC, Jessica Lynn Ellsworth, Attorney, Eugene Alexis Sokoloff, Michele W. Sartori, Esquire, Attorney, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Ap-pellees EBI, LP, EBI, LLC, Biomet, Inc.

United States v. DJO Global, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Relators Doris Modglin and Russ Milko appeal the district court’s grant of Defendant’s motions to dismiss. For reasons stated in the district court’s two well-reasoned opinions, dated September 2, 2014, and May 8,2015, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

'pjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.