United States v. DJO Global, Inc.
United States v. DJO Global, Inc.
678 F. App'x 594
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jarose v. County of Humboldt (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2020)
- Bottega, LLC v. National Surety Corporation-Chicago, Il (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2025)
- Bouman v. County of San Diego (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2024)
- Adel Yamout v. Jeffry Scapa (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2024)
- United States of America v. Dynamic Medical Systems, LLC. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2023)
- Anderberg v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2023)
- Charlton v. LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2023)
- Iceberg Associates LLP v. Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2023)
- Wigington v. MacMartin (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- City of Lincoln v. County of Placer (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
- Roger Feldman v. Discover Bank (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2021)
- Lucia Cortez v. Parkwest Rehabilitation Center, LLC (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2021)
- United States of America v. Sutter Health (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2021)
- Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2020)
- Riley v. United States (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
- U.S. & State v. Somnia, Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2018)
- In re Outlaw Labs., LP Litig. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Relators Doris Modglin and Russ Milko appeal the district court’s grant of Defendant’s motions to dismiss. For reasons stated in the district court’s two well-reasoned opinions, dated September 2, 2014, and May 8,2015, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
'pjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.