Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2017

Tate v. Family Auto Group, Inc.

Tate v. Family Auto Group, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 10, 2017 · Bybee, Christen, Graber
693 F. App'x 625

Tate v. Family Auto Group, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.

VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.

BYBEE, Circuit Judge,

acquiescing dubitante:

I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑